Click here to log in
Click here to log in
Home
Popular
Search
Rank
Users
About

Thought



Main Conversations Thoughts Quotes
 
Jamesvsteel23 Sept. 11, 2017, 12:02 a.m.
  • xsziorv
  • 1
  • 0
  • 1
 
"The conflict model of science and religion offered a mistaken view of the past and, when combined with expectations of secularisation, led to a flawed vision of the future. Secularisation theory failed at both description and prediction. The real question is why we continue to encounter proponents of science-religion conflict. Many are prominent scientists. It would be superfluous to rehearse Richard Dawkins’s musings on this topic, but he is by no means a solitary voice. Stephen Hawking thinks that ‘science will win because it works’; Sam Harris has declared that ‘science must destroy religion’; Stephen Weinberg thinks that science has weakened religious certitude; Colin Blakemore predicts that science will eventually make religion unnecessary. Historical evidence simply does not support such contentions. Indeed, it suggests that they are misguided."

https://aeon.co/ideas/why-religion-is-not-going-away-and-science-will-not-destroy-it
Comments