|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no conversations. |
|
|
|
|
James Mark Baldwin |
Like all science, psychology is knowledge; and like science again, it is knowledge of a definite thing, the mind. |
Pope John Paul II |
Science can purify religion from error and superstition. Religion can purify science from idolatry and false absolutes. |
Roshon Fegan |
I love dressing up. I like going out and buying some crazy stuff. I like stuff that's new, innovative and weird. I just pick out stuff that is unique and anything that I'm really diggin'. I don't really care if it's kind of out there. That's what I'm about. I like picking stuff that is really different. |
Ken Ham |
Our public schools arbitrarily define science as explaining the world by natural processes alone. In essence, a religion of naturalism is being imposed on millions of students. They need to be taught the real nature of science, including its limitations. |
John Keats |
I have been astonished that men could die martyrs for religion - I have shuddered at it. I shudder no more - I could be martyred for my religion - Love is my religion - I could die for that. |
James Mark Baldwin |
Psychology more than any other science has had its pseudo-scientific no less than its scientific period. |
Jean-Claude Van Damme |
Believe me - I've done very good stuff and very crazy stuff, and I don't regret the crazy stuff. |
Jerry Garcia |
And Warner Bros. seems to be pretty much into re-releasing all of their catalog. So there's the Warner Bros. stuff and the stuff that we have control over, we're gradually re-releasing it. Some stuff we don't have control over. |
Nicholas D'Agosto |
I like going to museums and stuff, but I also like going out and doing lots of physical activity like camping and hiking. I like doing stuff that I've never done before. Curiosity is a big thing. Usually it means that people are intelligent and that they want to learn stuff about the world. |
Nina Fedoroff |
The influence of a science adviser is only as good as ears open to that science advice. |
|
|
"The conflict model of science and religion offered a mistaken view of the past and, when combined with expectations of secularisation, led to a flawed vision of the future. Secularisation theory failed at both description and prediction. The real question is why we continue to encounter proponents of science-religion conflict. Many are prominent scientists. It would be superfluous to rehearse Richard Dawkins’s musings on this topic, but he is by no means a solitary voice. Stephen Hawking thinks that ‘science will win because it works’; Sam Harris has declared that ‘science must destroy religion’; Stephen Weinberg thinks that science has weakened religious certitude; Colin Blakemore predicts that science will eventually make religion unnecessary. Historical evidence simply does not support such contentions. Indeed, it suggests that they are misguided."
...
|
|
|
|
Some things in this article are poorly defined or supported. Overall, I think it's an obvious claim and that people's immense existential insecurity is what keeps religion alive. That and over-generalization and misattribution of observations and patterns.
"Its advocates would be well advised to stop fabricating an enemy out of religion, or insisting that the only path to a secure future lies in a marriage of science and secularism" - what is a "secure future"? Yeah, there are some famous people listed in the article, but I think most scientists stay out of this stuff. There are so many scientists that are religious. People compartmentalize. ...
This post is a comment.
|
|
|
|
Now you got me thinking though... what makes something funny... and why? I have read papers about this from psychology and from computer science but I'm not remembering.
This post is a comment.
|
|
|
|
I posted this a while ago but I'm pretty sure nobody read it. http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/science-through-buddhist-eyes
|
|
|
|
As much as I love the show and spirit science and all that stuff, it helps to enter the experiential world with a scientific mind rather than a speculative one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ
This post is a comment.
|
|
|
|
been thinking about what healthy skepticism of science looks like. Scientists are skeptical of science themselves. It's part of the nature of the profession. In fact, is having a skeptic perspective of scientific notions a scientific perspective in and of itself? Maybe not, maybe it depends on where the skepticism comes from or where it leads.
At the mention of skepticism of science, we might think of a group that gets a lot of attention and ridicule--flat earthers. In my opinion, it'd do some good to shift the discourse about flat earthers a bit. Will/might come back to what I was going to say about flat earthers because I'm about to play stardew valley...
...
|
|
|
|
Same. Okay, I should check that site out. YouTube is okay too. I find good stuff with related vids.
This post is a comment.
|
|
|
|
Good ideas! It's a javascript numerical library for stuff like statistics and networks with a focus on performance.
This post is a comment.
|
|
|
|
My favorite is his stuff about healthy marriages because it came out posthumously that he was secretly really into extramarital forces. I regret being to lazy to make a good physics pun.
This post is a comment.
|
|
|
|
"Today mother died. Or maybe yesterday; I can't be sure." This alludes to his claim that life is engrossed by the absurd. He believed that the absurd – life being void of meaning, or man's inability to know that meaning if it were to exist – was something that man should embrace. He argued that this crisis of self could cause a man to commit "philosophical suicide"; choosing to believe in external sources that give life (what he would describe as false) meaning. He argued that religion was the main culprit. If a man chose to believe in religion – that the meaning of life was to ascend to heaven, or some similar afterlife, that he committed philosophical suicide by trying to escape the absurd.
|
|